An independent observer of Romania's judiciary challenges the judicial council's defensive reaction to any proposal for changing how its members are elected.
On June 10th, CSM published a resolution labelling critics of the institution as "enemies of Justice".
Civic analyst Miron Damian challenges the logic by which any CSM reform automatically becomes an "attack".
Debating how judicial council members are chosen is legitimate practice in any consolidated democracy.
A former corporate employee opened a sandwich and salad factory, lost hundreds of thousands of euros in two years, and drew conclusions many entrepreneurs still refuse to hear.
A former corporate employee lost hundreds of thousands of euros after two years in sandwich production.
The core lesson: deep industry knowledge matters more than starting capital.
Cash flow, not lack of customers, remains the leading cause of failure in small firms.
Every time simulation results disappoint, teachers take the blame. But education research shows schools explain far less of the variance in outcomes than most people assume.
Family environment accounts for 50–70% of variation in school performance, per OECD data.
Good teachers can partially offset social disadvantage, but cannot eliminate it on their own.
Romania's structural school problems — infrastructure, pay, training — remain unaddressed.
PressOne dissected a document by the Superior Council of Magistracy and found 11 arguments with no factual basis — and a political act dressed in legal language.
CSM published a document framing public criticism of the judiciary as an attack on the rule of law.
PressOne identifies 11 arguments in the document as lacking real or legal grounding.
The document raises questions about CSM's ability to distinguish between legitimate scrutiny and subversion.